https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-painet-jb1483-sign-poster-you-have-a-right-to-water-kenya-pendekezu-11220337.html   ( picture credit)

(https://www.unwater.org/water-facts/water-and-gende ) PICTURE SOURCE

Oppression Through History

PICTURE BY by Yuuki Melby-Griffin ( a picture i took from google of a hand broken out of chains) suggesting oppression has been with mankind through time immemorial and it continues to live with us till date

Oppression is a pervasive and insidious force that affects individuals, communities, and the environment. It can take many forms, from visible structures of power and domination to invisible, insidious forces that shape our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. In this article, we will explore the connections between the oppression of women, eco-feminism, and animal welfare, highlighting how these forms of oppression intersect and reinforce one another.

What is Oppression? Oppression refers to the systemic and structural forces that maintain the power and privilege of dominant groups at the expense of marginalized and subordinated groups. It can take many forms, including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, and speciesism. Oppression can be visible, such as laws and policies that discriminate against certain groups, or invisible, such as the internalized biases and prejudices that shape our thoughts and behaviors.

The Oppression of Women

The oppression of women is a pervasive and insidious force that affects women and girls around the world. It can take many forms, including violence, discrimination, and marginalization. Women’s bodies are often controlled and regulated by patriarchal systems of power, which can limit their autonomy, agency, and freedom. Eco-feminism is a philosophical and activist movement that seeks to explore the connections between the oppression of women and the degradation of the environment. Eco-feminists argue that the domination of women and the domination of nature are interconnected, and that both are rooted in patriarchal systems of power and domination. As Ivona Gebara notes, “The domination of women and nature are interconnected, and both are rooted in patriarchal systems of power” (Gebara, 1999, p. 110).

The oppression of animals is a pervasive and insidious force that affects animals around the world. It can take many forms, including exploitation, cruelty, and neglect. Animals are often treated as commodities, rather than as living beings with inherent value and dignity.

Oppression is a complex and multifaceted force that affects individuals, communities, and the environment. The connections between the oppression of women, eco-feminism, and animal welfare are profound and far-reaching. By exploring these connections, we can gain a deeper understanding of how oppression operates, and we can work towards creating a more just and sustainable world.

As Vandana Shiva notes, “The struggle for women’s liberation and the struggle for environmental liberation are two sides of the same coin” (Shiva, 1988, p. 12). By recognizing the connections between these struggles, we can work towards creating a world that is more just, sustainable, and equitable for all. The struggles for women’s rights and environmental protection are often viewed as separate issues, but a closer examination reveals a profound connection between the two. The oppression of women and the degradation of nature are deeply intertwined, with both being rooted in systems of power and domination. In this article, we will explore the connections between women’s rights and environmental degradation, drawing on the insights of Ivona Gebara, Talita Correa, and Wangari Maathai.

Ivona Gebara, a liberation theologian and ecofeminist, highlights the intersectionality of women’s oppression and environmental degradation in her work, “Ecofeminism: A Latin American Perspective” (Gebara, 1999). Gebara argues that the domination of women and nature are interconnected, with both being rooted in patriarchal systems of power.

Talita Correa’s work, “Brazilian Slum Children Who Are Swimming in Garbage,” illustrates the human cost of environmental degradation, particularly for marginalized communities (Correa, The image of children swimming in garbage is a powerful metaphor for how environmental degradation and poverty are intertwined.

Wangari Maathai, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate and environmental activist, emphasizes the importance of recognizing the connections between environmental degradation, poverty, and women’s oppression (Maathai, n.d.). Maathai argues that “we cannot tire or give up” in our efforts to address these issues, and that we owe it to present and future generations to act.

Behind the material deprivation and cultural losses of marginalized and poor communities lies a deeper issue of power and domination. The exploitation of women and nature are not separate issues but are instead interconnected symptoms of a broader system of control and domination.

As Gebara notes, “The domination of women and nature are interconnected, and both are rooted in patriarchal systems of power” (Gebara, 1999, p. 110). This quote highlights how systems of power and domination underlie both women’s oppression and environmental degradation.

The connections between women’s rights and environmental degradation are complex and multifaceted. We can work towards a more just and sustainable world by recognizing the intersections between these issues. As Maathai emphasizes, “We cannot tire or give up” in our efforts to address these issues, and we owe it to present and future generations to act.

Reference

Correa, T. (n.d.). Brazilian slum children who are literally swimming in garbage. Retrieved from

Gebara, I. (1999). Ecofeminism: A Latin American perspective. In L. M. Russell & J. S. Clarkson (Eds.), Feminist theology: A reader (pp. 105-116). Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

Maathai, W. (n.d.). We cannot tire or give up.

The diagram illustrates the interconnectedness of various forms of oppression, including sexism, racism, classism, and heterosexism, among others. This intersectional perspective highlights how different forms of oppression intersect and compound, leading to unique experiences of marginalization and exclusion. Ecofeminism, which emphasizes the interconnectedness of human and non-human nature, can be seen as an extension of this intersectional perspective.

As I navigate two different classes, I am struck by the eerie connections between the concepts we are exploring. In one class, we are delving into Feminist Standpoint Theory, which highlights how social locations and experiences shape our understanding of the world. We are also discussing how women from diverse backgrounds face injustice in unique ways. Meanwhile, in my eco-feminism class, we are examining the interconnectedness of various forms of oppression, including sexism, racism, and classism.

The overlap between these two classes has been enlightening, particularly concerning intersectionality. As a black woman, I have faced numerous injustices, and my experiences differ significantly from those of white women. The concept of intersectionality acknowledges that individuals possess multiple identities, which intersect to creating unique experiences of oppression. However, as we discussed in class, men’s experiences of intersectionality are often tempered by privilege, rather than oppression.

Maria Mies’ work on patriarchal capitalism and the exploitation of women’s labor has been particularly insightful for me. Her analysis of how women’s bodies are controlled and commodified resonates deeply with my own experiences as a black woman. How women’s bodies are policed, objectified, and exploited are all too familiar

The diagram we are studying in eco-feminism class illustrates the interconnectedness of various forms of oppression, including sexism, racism, classism, and heterosexism. This visual representation has helped me understand how these forms of oppression intersect and compound, leading to unique experiences of marginalization and exclusion.

Reflecting on these connections, I am struck by the irony that these two classes, which seem unrelated at first glance, are deeply intertwined. The concepts we are exploring in both classes – intersectionality, oppression, privilege – are all interconnected, and understanding these connections is crucial for creating a more just and equitable world. As illustrated by the diagram, various forms of oppression, including sexism and racism, are interconnected and compound, leading to unique experiences of marginalization and exclusion. Unfortunately, these issues are often overlooked or ignored in our society, perpetuating systemic injustices. As someone passionate about social justice, I believe it’s essential to acknowledge and address these interconnected forms of oppression. By doing so, we can work towards creating a more equitable and inclusive society for all.

The ecofeminist perspective views the natural world and human societies as interconnected and interdependent. This perspective recognizes that the domination of nature is closely tied to the domination of marginalized groups, including women, people of color, and the poor (Warren, 1997). Ecofeminists argue that the exploitation of nature and the exploitation of marginalized groups are two sides of the same coin, and that challenging one form of exploitation requires challenging the other (Mies & Shiva, 1993).

Ecofeminism and intersectionality share a common concern with understanding and challenging multiple forms of oppression. Intersectionality highlights how different forms of oppression intersect and compound, leading to unique experiences of marginalization and exclusion (Crenshaw, 1989). Ecofeminism extends this analysis to include the natural world, recognizing that the domination of nature is closely tied to the domination of marginalized groups (Warren, 1997).

For example, menstruation is something which is part of the human nature, yet some cultures forbid the mentioning of it and educating on it as well, however in reality, it is an important issue because it is closely tied to women’s health, autonomy, and social and economic empowerment. The stigma and shame surrounding menstruation can lead to a range of negative outcomes, including poor health, limited education and economic opportunities, and social isolation (Bobel, 2010). Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive approach that considers the social, economic, and environmental contexts in which women live (Thomas, 2020). The survival species necessity of our bodily nature and that of humans around us is deeply rooted in our interconnectedness with the environment and each other. According to Warren (1997), all living organisms rely on one another for survival, highlighting the importance of recognizing our place within the natural world. In terms of human nature, our survival is also linked to our relationships with others. As emphasized by Mies and Shiva (1993), we are social beings that thrive on connections and interactions with other humans.

In conclusion, the ecofeminist perspective offers a powerful framework for understanding and challenging multiple forms of oppression simultaneously. By recognizing the interconnectedness of human and non-human nature, we can work towards creating a more harmonious and sustainable coexistence that supports the survival of our species and the planet.

References

Warren, K. J. (1997). Ecofeminism: Women, culture, nature. Indiana University Press.

Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. Zed Books.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139-167.

Bobel, C. (2010). New blood: Third-wave feminism and the politics of menstruation. Rutgers University Press.

1986). Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labour. Zed Books.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139-167.